Ep spell? gives you oh say instant heals for a set amount of time, for an ireased manaost XD
Dreadkin wrote:Angel form...kind of like shadow form, but it ireases healing from holy spells. I wouldn't be
opposed to it reding physal damage by 10% either. Physal damage redtion, blah when do Priests mele anyway. Make it -15% Spell damage (Iluding Di) for every hool eept Holy.
He's ed the ext same on the Druid forums :P
I think I remember answering a similar question in the warlk forum too. I love shadow form on my priest and I think it would be a lotooler thenile of healing to get a form elusive to healing in the holy tree. At least then we'd use it.
They're not raiding without a priest, they're raiding with a shadow priest :) But, if you are a good healer, you have nothing to worry about. There are so few healers out thereompared to otherlasses that if you know what you're doing you will earn yourself a raid spot. By the way, this was so last month :P Just messing with you, but you really are behind the times. For awhile now Paladins have been the raid healer ofhoe as no other healeran mah their single target healing effiey, plus bringing more than one paladin brings multle buffs to the raid, whereas bringing more than one holydi priest doesn't bring anything extra in terms of buffs. Next pah, Paladin healing is going to take a hit, so we'll see how things work out then. Personally I would mh rather have seen priests and other healers get a buff rather than having Paladins be nerfed, a
lot of paladins want to heal. If that frees me up to go Shadow, by all means make paladins great healers. So yeah, if youan't find a raiding guild, the problem isn't that they're not taking healing priests, the problem is that you don't know how to heal. The only guilds not taking holy priests at all will be the hardest of the harore guilds who minmax to the extreme.